RELATIVE RESEARCH RESEARCH PERFORMANCE

(Based on Faculty Formula)

The following percentages represent the distribution of performance scores across the Department. Shown is the percentage of the total score, together with percentage of weighted publications for each academic staff member, percentage of weighted number of grants and percentage of weighted grant funding. Each of these scores were calculated according to the Faculty of Medicine Formula described on the previous page. This formula applies to cumulative totals for succeeding periods of three years, as shown.

Overall % (%of weighted: publications, number of grants, grant $)

1989-91 1990-92 1991-93

_______________________________________________________________________________

Academic staff

Allen 15.2 (18.6, 7.9, 8.0) 15.7 (19.0, 8.2, 9.7) 16.1 (20.7, 7.0, 6.9)

Bennett 24.1 (21.2, 21,6, 38.4) 19.4 (16.7, 18.9, 30.4) 19.4 (17.9, 18.7, 26.3)

Burke 0 3.3 (3.2, 5.3, 1.6) 4.2 (3.3, 7.8, 4.2)

Carlile - 1.3 (2.0, -, -) 1.1 (6.8, -, -)

Cleland - 1.2 (1.6, 0, 1) 0.9 (1.4, -, -)

Cook

& Young 12.1 (12.5, 12.4, 10.6) 12.9 (12.6, 14.0, 13.3) 15.9 (16.6, 14.6, 14.1)

Cottee 0.9 (1.4, 0, 0) 0.8 (1.2, 0, 0) 0.7 (1.0, 0, 0)

Dampney 5.0 (5.1, 5.0, 4.8) 5.0 (4.5, 5.6, 6.4) 4.5 (2.9, 6.6, 8.6)

Davey 3.6 (3.5, 2.6, 5.0) 3.4 (3.3, 2.2, 5.2) 1.8 (1.3, 1.9, 3.7)

Gow 1.8 (2.0, 2.4, 0.6) 0.9 (0.7, 2.0, 0.6) 0.9 (0.5, 2.2, 1.0)

Hoh 7.7 (6.7, 10.6, 8.8) 6.3 (5.3, 9.1, 7.6) 5.1 (3.7, 8.3, 7.5)

Martin 3.8 (5.6, -, -) 3.7 (5.6, -, -) 2.7 (3.5, 1.0, 1.2)

Mason 5.5 (3.3, 13.2, 6.6) 4.8 (2.9, 10.4, 6.6) 4.6 (2.5, 10.5, 6.8)

Morris 13.1 (12.1, 16.9, 13.6) 13.1 (12.3, 17.1, 13.6) 15.2 (14.9, 15.0, 16.5)

Phillips 2.2 (3.2, -, -) 2.3 (3.4, -, -) 2.6 (3.7, 0.7, 0.3)

Sefton 5.0 (4.8, 7.4, 3.5) 5.6 (5.6, 7.1, 4.2) 4.5 (4.5, 5.8, 2.9)

W.D Wright Research Fellow Lavidis - 2.5 (3.2,0.9,1.4) 3.2 (3.6,1.9,3.0)